Step 1: Abuse your administrative privileges to post a discussion in a place reserved for announcements and marketing material.
Step 2: Actively insult most of the primary contributors to the project.
Step 3: Use misinformation to back up your salient points.
Step 4: Refuse to stop using this misinformation after you get called on it.
Step 5: Insist that "how things are" is different from how things are.
Step 6: Insist that you're saying something different from what you're saying. Ignore it when people call you on it.
Step 7: Accuse the most vocal members of the community of being too meek to voice their opinions.
Step 8: Above all, insist that you have a huge cadre of supporters who are waiting in the wings, but that you don't know who they are because they are afraid to voice their opinions.
Step 9: Pause a moment to note the delicious irony between points 7 and 8.
Step 10: Profit.

Yes, this post is the purest form of irony.

If you don't know what this post is about, my apologies; I don't plan on following up to explain. Please don't ask.

and then (in fact it had to be 7m points)

step 11, be upset that "they dont understand your Greatness". Move over to another Open Source project, make room for a new Great person

Inspiring

Now I know where I went so wrong. I tried the hard work method my father told me to use.

#12 (the funniest)

Call all the primary contributors "a bunch of cheerleading psychopants."

The front page of Drupal.org

The front page of Drupal.org is definitely not a good place for people to raise their own questions and concerns. I remember feeling bewildered when seeing that post on the front page, it seemed like some guy was trying to take over or something.

They should create a co-op

They should create a co-op together :)

-1 spelling

The word you're looking for is 'sycophant.'

'Psychophant! appears to be a Freudian portmanteau.

Oh, the insinuendo of it all! ;-)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.